![]() |
You are viewing Create a LiveJournal Account Learn more | Explore LJ: Life Entertainment Music Culture News & Politics Technology |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |

Kanye West sporting the most useless sunglasses on the face of the earth. Photo from Google Images.
I was reading Radical Queer News and came across an article from Pink News that explains how Kanye West, hip-hop star and that guy that told former President Bush that he “hates black people,” is trying to reinvent the word “gay.” Warning: When reading the following direct quotations, hilarity may ensue.
Kanye said “that the term will be used in future as synonymous with fashionable and stylish.
“Speaking in an interview with Details, West said:
‘I like to embody titles or words that have negative connotations and explain why that’s good. Take the word gay. Like, in hip-hop, that’s a negative thing, right? But in the past two, three years, all the gay people I’ve encountered have been, like, really, really, extremely dope. I haven’t gone to a gay bar, nor do I ever plan to. But where I would talk to a gay person, the conversation would be mostly around art or design, it’d be really dope.
‘From a design standpoint, kids’ll say, “Dude, those pants are gay.” But if it’s good, good, good fashion-level, design-level stuff, where it’s on a higher level than the average commercial design stuff, it’s gay people that do that. I think that should be said as a compliment. Like,”‘Dude, that’s so good it’s almost gay.”‘
West has talked about his perception of gay men as fashion icons in the past, drawing speculation over his sexuality. He said in a statement: ‘Stereotypically gay people got such good [style] … they were smart enough to take a fresh-ass logo like the rainbow and say that it’s gonna be theirs.’”
You just let that all sink in.
And while I thank Kanye for his support and enthusiasm for the queer community, I don’t exactly think he will help the cause. I mean drawing on stereotypes that gays are snappy dressers, artists and designers isn’t exactly constructive, and his affinity for the rainbow is just plain hilarious.
But I suppose it could be worse: He could be saying negative things about queers, or maybe former President Bush could speak out on our behalf.
From reading some of the entries at http://www.stevefielding.com.au/blog/com
In terms of the payment being unnecessary for many students - at university if you study Physics, then you shouldn’t need to pay the Language teachers. Without Language teachers, there are no Universities and thus no Physics teachers. You are supporting an entire institution and the fee structure should reflect this. Without some students, the nature of university changes and education may become increasingly unattainable. Since we are part of a whole, we need consider that our own non participation affects others. We should be allowed a vote, a democratic voice in a democracy - rather than abstaining as Voluntary Student Unionism permits, we need to participate in the democratic process of our Universities - if not, then you’re not opposing the so called socialist left wing - you’re ignoring the democratic process. You’re voting and evaluating the need for a student services fee, not whether or not you personally need it.
According to your theories, I should not pay taxes, I am not the Prime Minister of Australia and do not therefore need accommodation at the lodge. I am also not a pensioner, or a native Australian or a single mother - let’s move on from democracy, it obviously doesn’t realise I need a new Ferrari. Somehow we create sanctions for those who need it and will potentially need assistance; it is how our society develops and advances human rights.
I am a student though…can I get a break? Essential student services like employment services, help with accommodation, student poverty including financial assistance are problems anyone can face - your exemption and lack of requirement is fortune - not every Australian can say the same, I’m one of them.